Isaac "Yitzy" Schleifer
City Council District 5
About
Isaac “Yitzy” Schleifer is the Councilman for the 5th District of Baltimore City.
Councilman Schleifer is a lifelong resident of the 5th District and currently serving on the City Council since 2016. Councilman Schleifer is the Chair of the Rules and Legislative Oversight Committee and serves on both the Health, Environment, and Technology Committee and the Ways and Means Committee.
I'm thrilled to announce that the Baltimore City Office of Inspector General position I've been advocating for at Baltimore City Department of Public Works is now included in the annual budget. This move will enable us to identify and eliminate waste, fraud, and abuse within the city's largest agency, providing a significant return on investment. Moreover, it will boost employee morale by demonstrating a commitment to addressing these issues full-time. ... See MoreSee Less
2 CommentsComment on Facebook
Thank you it is good to know at least 1 councilman cares about the citizens Thank you Again
Do u support her fight to follow the $$$$$ Councilman Isaac Yitzy Schleifer is more important now as she fight to keep us the constituents of Baltimore City in the know of waste..fraud... im still waiting for results for www.helpbaltimoreshomeless.org our homeless shelters
We were honored to once again join the incredible team at Weekend Backpacks at Har Sinai-Oheb Shalom Congregation for a truly special milestone, packing their 1,000,000th meal.
This moment represents so much more than a number. It’s a million acts of care, a million reminders that our community shows up for one another.
Weekend Backpacks works tirelessly to get meals into schools across Baltimore so students can bring food home for the weekend, helping fight food insecurity and ensuring no child goes hungry when school doors close.
Proud to be part of a community that turns compassion into action. ... See MoreSee Less
1 CommentComment on Facebook
Amazing 👏
The city has now fully funded retiree benefits, freeing up $6 million this year over previous years.
So where did it go?
It certainly didn’t go to taxpayers.
At the same time, revenues are rising to historic levels, and we’re being told there is nothing for property tax relief. Not even a penny back.
That $6 million alone could push our tax rate to the lowest level in my lifetime.
Instead, taxpayers get nothing.
It’s not a matter of lacking resources, but rather a lack of priorities. ... See MoreSee Less
1 CommentComment on Facebook
When are you going to investigate mayor Scott and all the wasted taxpayer dollars
... See MoreSee Less
This content isn't available right now
When this happens, it's usually because the owner only shared it with a small group of people, changed who can see it or it's been deleted.0 CommentsComment on Facebook
Something here just doesn’t add up.
The State cut funding to MONSE from $6.5 million down to $4.8 million, yet at the same time, the City is increasing its general fund contribution by another $6 million.
If the State is pulling back, what are they seeing that we’re not? ... See MoreSee Less
0 CommentsComment on Facebook
A 50% increase in funding for homeless services administration, totaling $3.5 million. How much of this money actually directly benefits those in need? This substantial amount could be utilized for direct services like shelter, treatment, job support, and pathways to stable housing.
Given the urgency of the situation, the priority should be to allocate resources directly to the unhoused, rather than expanding administrative costs. ... See MoreSee Less
4 CommentsComment on Facebook
You are the epitome of a great representative by keeping us informed and standing up for our beliefs
This is just more pork so Brandon can buy influence.
We’re spending $73,000,000 on the homeless?! “Homeless administration”? What is that? Homelessness has become an industry. If the “drug involved” don’t agree to treatment they shouldn’t be getting other services. How many of the providers are “non profits”? And how much are their CEO’s being paid?
No matter how much money you throw at this, the people in the end will still choose to be on the streets for the most part.